People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests, but based on the kinds of jobs they can get.
It has been argued for quite a long time whether people should pick their academic subjects according to their interest or as per jobs available in the industry. However, while I strongly disagree with the statement that they should select education streams on the basis of availability of the jobs, I believe they should choose it according to their strong curiosity. In this essay, I will provide some compelling evidence further to support my agreement.
With regards to interest, people perform effectively and efficiently when they get a job in the area of their own interest. Effectiveness helps them to achieve milestones in their professional careers. Moreover, if they work on tasks related to their hobby then they do better, creative, and faster. For instance, athletes’, who are energetic and keen interested in sports since their childhood, do better in sports activities because of their interest.
On the other hand, if people pick their educational streams as per the job market then they would not be able to perform that specific job perfectly and effectively. Furthermore, working hard at work without any interest in the job could lead to frustration among people. Consequently, they would fail at their jobs or in their professional careers. To exemplify, in many multinational companies, software engineers, who are forced to do this job due to the wide availability of this profession, have to develop logical applications without their interest which leads to application functionality failure because of incorrect logic created by them.
To sum up, people should choose their academic course subjects according to their curiosity and interest which could help them do a job in the area of their hobby. On the other hand, they should not be forced to work in the area where they can get jobs easily, otherwise it would become difficult for them to survive in their professional careers.
- You recently went to the cinema and think that you left something that belongs to you there. Write a letter to the cinema manager. In your lettersay when you were at the cinema and which film you sawdescribe what item you have lost and where you think you 78
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 81
- These days, many people are interested in buying organic food even though it is often more expensive than conventionally produced food.What are some reasons that people prefer organic food?Do you think it is important to buy organic food despite the highe 67
- You recently travelled on the local bus service in your town. You think the driver drove badly and was rude to the passengers. Write a letter to the manager of the local bus service. In your letterintroduce yourself and say when the incident happeneddescr 78
- It has been noted that many people who had a big impact on the world gave themselves completely to their work and did not bother with the idea of “work-life balance”. To what extent should people try to have a good work-life balance?Give reasons for y 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 20.9802955665 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20967741935 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91599521531 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525806451613 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.939515865 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409609855677 0.242375264174 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165232335131 0.0925447433944 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967241136937 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279421371453 0.151781067708 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658607677573 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.