School children nowadays are not playing more sports compared to their parents in their childhood.
Do you agree or disagree? Support your ideas with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of playing sports in schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of parents' childhood are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to play more sports can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, playing more sports can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of energetic students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of healthy lifestyles. Thus, beneficial ramifications of parents' education are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, playing sports in school can supply the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of an inefficient idea are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described exhausted children. Hence, predicted outcomes of parents' childhood are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of playing more sports in schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of efficient parents prove the significance of cheerful children, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-06-19 | Alireza.r.m | 90 | view |
2020-02-20 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
2019-05-27 | mojtaba1980 | 84 | view |
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 80
- Should schools make it compulsory to learn a foreign language 93
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects Do you agree or disagree Give examples from your experience 88
- Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries 88
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization To what extent do you agree with it 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62995594714 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1317031584 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638766519824 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0378781778 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.181818182 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257685707402 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847751938216 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436701654349 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145519033836 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295894466944 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.