should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner
The importance of government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that government build new roads for people way to easy travel for one place to another place. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that build new roads very beneficial for us and easy to arrive for people. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoints, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that should government build new roads help to people easy to travelling for more vehicle. Besides, new roads with the help of any people arrive one place to another place. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the drawbacks of should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner are indeed too dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | gur1040894 | 55 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-22 | vaimikpatel2908@gmail.com | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96694214876 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54124168387 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51652892562 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.264360815 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.272727273 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408014284296 0.242375264174 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155837144974 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196132241921 0.071462118173 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299150200792 0.151781067708 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163214470025 0.0609392437508 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.