Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
One of the most increasing problems in today's world is increasing in the number of vehicles on the roads. The question is always debatable that of do government should build more roads or improve the public transportation. Many people believe that government should build more roads to accommodate more vehicles. Others reject this notion and claim that improving public transport is the only solution. The following essay would further elaborate both sides with examples before jumping to conclusion.
There are myriad benefits of using private automobiles. To begin with the positive side, usage of the private vehicle is also significant for a better traveling system as there are countless reasons for that but the most significant one is that it saves lots of time. Critics also believe that possessing one's vehicle is the citizen choice and government should take appropriate actions to provide the space for cars on the roads. For example, in Sydney the number of vehicles increased from 20% to 60 % in last decade, so, therefore the number of roads increased drastically.
On the other hand, there is a debate of arguments in favor of my stand. The most important one is that public transport is the only way to keep the overcrowding under control. Not only it improves the public transport but there will be a decline in the environmental damage caused by the increased vehicles. Improving public transportation can help people from all different classes including lower to upper middle class. For example, take newly build metro train route in Delhi according to the ABC news, it reduces the traffic jamming up to 10 percent in the area.
According to the arguments above-mentioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that the benefits of strengthening transportation infrastructure are indeed too good to ignore and further the government has to take a step to improve public modes of transport which not only reduces traffic but also decrease the global warming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- Many institutes and universities practice written examination and not computer-based tests for their students. Your opinion on that. 80
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- In under developed countries tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinion with relevant examples. 77
- The time people devoted to job leaves very time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time causes? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e. Critics also believe that possessing ones vehicle is the citizen choice and gover...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 323.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14241486068 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8655059671 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1611166431 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337567093603 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112291376184 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129865989088 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202047960079 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140361020481 0.0609392437508 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.