should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
The importance of improve in the public transport which was always debatable has now become controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial Influences of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion
There are myriad of reason which I will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that this will ultimately reduce the pollution level because individual will prefer public transport as their made of accommodation. Consequently, this significant step will also reduce the traffic on roads. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that as it will prove to be a boon for our environment.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the vital effects is that it will also reduce the government revenue. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend in favor of this trend
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of improve the network of public transport are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d thus will lead to a logical conclusion There are myriad of reason which I will ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gainst this trend in favor of this trend According to the arguments aforementione...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80651798674 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.295389539 50.4703680194 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.0 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114465948215 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561049614233 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499101394943 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853317650042 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407304564986 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.