Smoking is harmful to health and some governments have banned smoking in public. Do you think it is justified on their part to ban smoking?
Most of the nation's government has banned smoking in public as we all know that smoking is injurious to health, which has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be agreed that ban of smoking in public is logical, while on the other hand stands a perspective that this affects the business of cigarette makers. The following paragraphs will elaborate both the sides of the stance taken with pertinent aspects and examples.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which proponents cite on the government of a ban on smoking at public places. One of the most preponderant reasons is that ban on smoking in public places prevent other people who can indirectly inhale the smoke and lead to detrimental health issues. Furthermore, this helps in making the environment clean and healthy. For instance, according to the recent survey done by Times India, it is evident that ban by government reduces approx 30% number of deaths from smoking or lungs cancer. Thereby, it is apparent that the government who banned smoking in public is justified.
Nevertheless, some people hold an opposing viewpoint and tend to believe that government earns huge amount of revenue from the smoke business which will hamper if they ban smoking in public. Moreover, this eventually affects shopkeepers running a business on a very scale. To exemplify, in a recent news when the government of one nation ban smoking in public causes strikes, violence in the state and decreases the revenue. Hence, not only it lowers the government revenue but also affecting the local public.
From above discussion, it can be concluded that the impacts of the smoking ban on government are prominent. In my opinion, the advantages overweigh the demerits on government and public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-06 | jitendarjeet | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-02 | NavKaur | 80 | view |
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 55
- Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion 91
- Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion 95
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 77
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
Most of the nations government has banned smoking in public...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09863945578 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7429668919 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534013605442 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9271452104 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458481846083 0.242375264174 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176301533049 0.0925447433944 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120239930939 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309290539963 0.151781067708 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563738345955 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.