Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle-free days .To what extent do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In era of disturbance with pollution everywhere cause much unambiguous consequences on health and life expectancy of human being. Some cities's regime with people are coming out to support and campaign to leverage of public transport in central area. It is claimed that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall discuss both positive and negative by analyzing this argument and provide the logical conclusion.
There are myriad advantages of emphasizing and support the public transports than using own private vehicle. On of them is financial budget boost which was going energy resources such as petrol, diesel etc now it would be save. Secondly, people use car pool mechanism while coming and going to office will remove significant traffic from road, much enough to clear traffic jam. In central area where commuters on private vehicle generally spend much time in traffic jam if we allow all vehicles inbound and outbound to central part. Basically heavy and private vehicles should be removed from central city until it is a case of emergency.
On contrary, people who argue that there are disadvantages of banning these vehicles are correct and believe they are right on this argument. They argue that fatigue and health issue may spreading while aboard in public vehicles. For aged persons, it is harass matter to travel which may cause severe lost of life. Before boarding and off-boarding from vehicles some people may cause chaos and may create hazardous issue.
In recapitulate, while there are strong arguments on both sides, in my personal view, we should nurture pure air, health with accepting the fact and emphasize the public transport. I would recommend that regime should take care any chaos, women security issue while travelling.
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 80
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- Employee who are overqualified for which employer might not be happy and how he can be given good position in organization by not letting him quit. 77
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, white-water river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 80
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and provide the logical conclusion. There are myriad advantages of emphasizi...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... city until it is a case of emergency. On contrary, people who argue that there...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'harassed'.
Suggestion: harassed
...ublic vehicles. For aged persons, it is harass matter to travel which may cause severe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chaos and may create hazardous issue. In recapitulate, while there are strong ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, secondly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21678321678 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59709019869 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622377622378 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4479578617 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4666666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173469092274 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553264182951 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493160169527 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883857604771 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536175777267 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.