Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
In the contemporary era, the university education system is becoming a heated debate among people. Most of the people often believe that scholars should give right to choose their subject according to their choice, but others decline this notion as they think that students must study subjects such as related to science and technology. I will discuss both sides to give a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, it has myriad benefits when students choose subjects according to their interest. First and foremost, this tread aid them to explore their talent, to cite an epitome, my friend have done degree in music because he was interested in singing and now he is teacher of music in top-level university. Secondly, it is fruitful to get higher grades in studies as well. Finally, it is also beneficial in health point of view because it overcome the chances of hypertension.
On the other hand, some people think that people should opt to subjects by considering the future prospective. Firstly, these subjects have a huge scope in future as it is a tech-savvy world. Secondly, it would provide more opportunities to aspirants to get a lucrative job with a huge salary package. For instance, a study conducted by the Economic Times reveals that professional degree holders have 50% more salary as compare to other workers.
To recapitulate, after analyzing, I firmly concur that both perspectives has advantages to aspirants. However, taking subject according to their choice is more beneficial for aspirants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 447, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overcomes'?
Suggestion: overcomes
...cial in health point of view because it overcome the chances of hypertension. On the ot...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17886178862 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84185593437 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4308865826 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227392375784 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670664690948 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986981687897 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124579626909 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108979825092 0.0609392437508 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.