Do you think the school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago?
In the contemporary era, there is an ongoing debate about whether pupils should study dramas and other works of art to study literature on not. The substantial number of people claims that it has myriad benefits to juveniles. However, other holds a contrary view about this notion. I will scrutinize both sides of the argument before lead to a plausible conclusion.
To embark with, the most prime benefit of participating in dramas is personality development of aspirants. To cite an epitome, a study conducted in Harward University reveals that being part of plays, scholars must stimulate their confidence as well as creativity. Besides, it will not only assist them to acquire information about culture, traditions, and rituals but also teaches them life lessons. Not only that, through motion pictures, learners can imbibe thing practically instead of only reading literature.
On the flip side, a fair amount of people against this practice because they believe that aspirants should focus on subjects such as science and technology. It is irrefutable that a plethora of students keen to explore their knowledge in other fields instead of arts-related fields. However, who are interested in arts, this phenomenon has ample fruitful impacts on a child’s mental growth.
To recapitulate, the study of motion pictures could serve multiple advantages for pupils as it will enhance the overall personality of a student. Hence, I firmly believe that it is a step in the forward direction of efficient learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | being human | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | arami | 85 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 72
- cashless society merits and demerits. 75
- life expectancy 77
- music promotes learning. 72
- government should spend money to improve better roads or public transportation. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32780082988 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91253795871 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647302904564 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6055260509 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7692307692 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0692921637071 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203947591891 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296223372758 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410451333865 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165388105459 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.