Some people think that government should spend as much money as possible as developing innovation science and technology other people disagree and think that this money should spent on basic needs. Which one of these options do you agree with?
The importance of spending time of government which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this nation. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former/latter proposition appears to be more rational. This easy will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that Government should invest money in improving medical technology. Consequently, it will improve life expectancy of a society. For instance, in USA the government is spending more money in medical sector. Therefore, average life span of an individual is more as compared to developing nation.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that government should indulge in upgrading education sector. This is because it is considered as the base of overall development of a particular country. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach conclusion that the benefits of spending money on education and medical sector are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Shruti gupta radhika | 77 | view |
- Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media 77
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think? 85
- Can money bring happiness? What are the factors for happiness? 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model. Do you support it or not? 77
- Should government build more roads on allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rage life span of an individual is more as compared to developing nation. Ela...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35585585586 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95830396903 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9833907212 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0833333333 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192151827682 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658909923211 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524248794434 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115687662723 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313673296256 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.