Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional finding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors
Since the beginning of the 21st century, 90% of companies have used the advertisements to increase their sales. Some people people believe that using the advertisements in public schools is considered usefull for funding these schools, while others argue that companies should not exploit children in their advertisements to increase their sales. This essay will discuss the reasons why the public schools shall accept the financial support from companies advertisements which is not considered exploitation of schools children.
The public schools shall accept the financial support from the advertisement companies becasue it can help these schools increasing their performance. Public schools can use these money to enhance the educational environment for the students. For example, public schools may paint the building, or they can buy new tables and chairs for children. Therefore, bublic schools should accept the moneys which are submitted by advertisements companies.
On the other hand, some people think that using the advertisements in public schools is considered exploitation of schools children. They assume that these companies do not have the legal rights to use the schools children to increase their sales. For example, they may abbuse to the children during their advertisements. But these people are unaware of the fact that some public schools are suffering from a bad financial support, which could lead to decrease in the learning techniques. Thus, public companies should accept dealing with advertisements companies to support their learning systems.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the impact of placing advertisements in the public schools. While it provides additional funding resource to the schools, it exploits children badly. In my opinion, I think that schools should accept funding from advertisement sponsor corporations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-30 | halbouni1984 | 70 | view |
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 73
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places How do you think this has changed the way we work Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology 86
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in our society People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals Do you agree or disagree 89
- As a result of tourism many historical buildings and sites are being damaged beyond repair What could be done to prevent this 84
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: people
...tisements to increase their sales. Some people people believe that using the advertisements i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...eir performance. Public schools can use these money to enhance the educational environment ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... advertisement sponsor corporations.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76258992806 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98882552151 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446043165468 0.580463131201 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4969878425 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373152573856 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155795256667 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100484475471 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263558739561 0.151781067708 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161758905503 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.