Urban sprawl is an increasing issue around the world. One way in which to solve this issue is to construct cities verically rather than horizontally. Are such cities a good idea?
Since the beginning the 21st century, number of people who live inside the cities has increased significantly, which forced many governments to transform into the construction of vertical cities rather than horizontal cities. Some people believe that constructing vertical cities is the best solution to overcome the urban sprawl, while others argue that adopting vertical cities is not a good choice and may lead to a negative consequences. This essay will discuss the reasons why adopting vertical cities does not provide the solution of the urban sprawl.
Adopting vertical cities to solve the problem of urban sprawl is not accurate because it leads to the traffic congestion. Building tallest towers leads to increase number of vehicles which affects on traffic flow. Recent research, which was conducted in the Cambridge University, has shown that adopting the idea of constructing the vertical cities has led to the traffic congestion in the most cities throughout the world. Therefore, it seems clear the adopting the vertical cities is not useful to solve the urban sprawl problem.
On the other hand, some people think that constructing vertical cities enables people to reach the cities centers more easily and within a short time. Most people these days are working at the cities centers, and living inside tallest building enables people to reach their offices in less than one hours. But these people are unaware of the fact that building vertical cities leads to traffic congestion. Thus, the problem of urban sprawl could not be solved through constructing vertical buildings.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the reasons why adopting the vertical cities does not solve the urban sprawl. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that urban sprawl problem is solved through right planning and good designing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-31 | halbouni1984 | 72 | view |
- Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive social welfare from governments in order for them to continue their work. 65
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places How do you think this has changed the way we work Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology 78
- Some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the same food, do you like this way? 72
- Combat sports such as boxing are popular. Some people believe that combat sports encourage violence while others believe they promotes self restraint and discipline.Choose which side you most agree with and discuss why you choose that position. Support yo 55
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
... good choice and may lead to a negative consequences. This essay will discuss the reasons wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one hour', 'an hour', or simply 'hours'?
Suggestion: one hour; an hour; hours
...ple to reach their offices in less than one hours. But these people are unaware of the fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough right planning and good designing.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31615120275 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55999676728 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8985245538 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320797513089 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14189098394 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04693047539 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223000968485 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389892308539 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.