Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss
Since the beginning of the 21st century, companies have adopted new strategies in taking decisions. Some people believe that company top level authorities should adopt employees suggestions, while others argue that employees should not be shared in decisions taking. This essay will discuss the reasons why the company top level authorities should listen to their employees ideas and suggestions.
Top level authorities in companies should listen to the suggestions and thoughts of their employees because they own a deep experience. Employees knowledge is useful in enhancing the products quality. Recent research, which was conducted in the Cambridge university, has shown that 92% of American companies have used the consultations of their employees which contributed significantly in increasing the profits of these companies. Therefore, it seems clear that taking of suggestions and proposals of employees is very important and is crucial in rising the profitability.
On the other hand, some people think that companies top level authorities should not listen to the suggestions of their employees because their duties do not include providing suggestions. These people think that company have a specific department who is responsible on providing consultations. But these people are unaware of the fact that listening to the people who work directly with machines is very important in improving the companies performance. Thus, top level
companies should listen to their employees regardless the existence of any special departments.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the reason why company must listen to their workers and should adopt their ideas. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that workers ideas are very important and the company management should adopt these ideas since they contribute significantly in the company productivity.
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones,tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post- 11
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 80
- Gerontologists, people who study the process of ageing, are getting closer to finding a way to increase the human lifespan significantly. They claim that within the next few decades humans may be live for 500 years or more.would living for 500 years have 70
- More and more businesses, as well as individuals, are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating. 77
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believes that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ines is very important in improving the companies performance. Thus, top level companies...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68817204301 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01753375288 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476702508961 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5441692372 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.076923077 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473995006541 0.242375264174 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183400060001 0.0925447433944 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117374971344 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283293293917 0.151781067708 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11284458544 0.0609392437508 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.