A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones,
tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post-paper” world where people are connected
to one device or another at all times.
Should schools stop teaching handwriting entirely and focus instead on their typing skills? Is handwriting no longer relevant?
Since the beginning of the 21st century, large number of schools have adopted teaching typing skills rather than writing skills, they think that people in future will only use technological devices which require only typing skills. Some people believe that handwriting learning should be stopped at schools and it should be replaced by typing skills learning. This essay will discuss the reasons why schools should teach children only typing skills and stop teaching them the handwriting. Also, this essay will illustrate that handwriting is no longer relevant.
Schools have to adopt the system of learning which focuses on the learning of typing skills. After 20 years, It is expected that all careers will become computerized, and the typing skills is the only skills which are requested. Recent research, which was conducted in the University of Science and Technology, has shown that 95% of jobs will be done using computers and smartphones in the next decade. Therefore, it seems clear that teaching typing skills is necessary and schools should stop learning the traditional hand writing.
Nowadays, most news, books, and journal are published on the internet. People have stopped using the traditional way of reading books because it takes a lot of time and efforts, in addition, using the internet enables people to acquire any type of information just only in few second. For example, in the past, people were facing a problem of finding the books they need because limited number of handwriting copies, but now, the internet enables people to find any article or book just by typing its name. Thus, handwriting will disappear in the near future and it will replaced by e-books.
In conclusion, this essay discussed why the schools should establish a new system of learning which depends on the typing skills, and the handwriting will not be available in the next few decades. In my opinion, I believe that using computers and smartphones will absolutely replace the traditional written books in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-31 | halbouni1984 | 11 | view |
- As a result of tourism many historical buildings and sites are being damaged beyond repair What could be done to prevent this 84
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 73
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence, while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways. What is your opinion? 55
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 80
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 572, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
...isappear in the near future and it will replaced by e-books. In conclusion, this essa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ional written books in the near future.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 329.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19452887538 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58448044614 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495440729483 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.246634463 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790821305626 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317465269896 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361310958176 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05353014045 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021203669682 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.