Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, placing advertisements in schools has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are Pros and Cons of placing advertisement in schools?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial for school's funding, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, schools are bound up inextricably with formal education, which indicates they lead to both assessment and teaching. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between sports event and supportive sponsors as well as an exponential increase in performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of academic achievement is correlated positively with not only traditional methods but also skilled teachers.
Within the realm of socioeconomic, without the slightest doubt, funding attribute to student's tuition, in that it would come down to parents, government, and private schools. A salient example of such attribution is personal trait, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take psychological influence for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint advertisement programs problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to sponsor captivation, mental health, and even children. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of privates sectors and government's investment.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the disadvantages of placing advertisements in schools far outweigh its advantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | neethujithin | 55 | view |
- The envornment we are live in is in danger due to various problems. So what do you think should be responsible for solving it.Is the government,organizations or individuals. 85
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 77
- "The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn"- Alvin Toffler. Explain the statement and do you agree or disagree. The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power pro 80
- ’In future illiterate will not be those who cannot read, but those who do not learn’ – By some writer. Discuss what do you understand by this statement and state your reason. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the education standpoint, schools a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...methods but also skilled teachers. Within the realm of socioeconomic, witho...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectors and governments investment. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95087719298 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33573320811 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691228070175 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5028035318 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167006993707 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472492973691 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542912552708 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980672741969 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622771186893 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.