One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the money spend for space travel. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, spending money for space travel has more negative impacts than positives in the society and environment.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefits of spending money in space travel is the people will get an opportunity to know more about the universe. For example, people, unlike in the past, now have more knowledge about sun and planets, as they only used to imagine before.
On the other hand, there are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that spending money in space travel have negative consequences for the environment in various ways. Firstly, chemical and air pollutants created because of space travel have degraded the environment, such as in space crafts travelled for Mars. According to "Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of space travel has increased from 10 percent to 30 percent today. Secondly, a large portion of money is spent to construct rockets, because of which budget for poverty elimination has cut-off.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of The USA is taking great initiatives to educate its people against the negative impacts of space travel. Citizens are being taught to spend more to save environment, to protect the balance of ecosystem.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of spending money in the space travel are indeed too dire to ignore.
- Any recent Invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society. 80
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late？ 77
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree? 55
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists rather than local people. Why is this? What can be done to encourage local people to visit museums and historical sites? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0035335689 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69943388058 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530035335689 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1524724962 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281811109897 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107072760625 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796470543234 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168979421667 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568730785128 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.