Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters Do u support it or not Agree Disagree

Recently it is most conspicuous that famous sports' personalities and film celebrities are a role model to youngsters. This notion had sparked a heated debate among individuals. In this essay, I will elucidate my point of view about this concept.

From a social standpoint, the advantages of following a sports' personality are that young minds can learn from the life experiences and get the impetus to succeed in their personal life. To quote an example we can cite the story of an international cricket star called Dinesh who was inspired by the famous cricketer Dhoni and followed his path.

However, on the flipside, there are a few disadvantages too. Few celebrities are selfish, money minded and follow a certain diet or promote products for their income and personal interest. They do not think about the society or people follow them. Money is the main motive. Following these types of celebrities will be a great debacle for their followers. For example, a youngster using the same product of her beloved celebrity may not yield the same result. It is because the celebrity is promoting a product for money whereas the follower is trusting and using the same product without proper checking.

To conclude, though there are both pros and cons in having a public figure who is popular in movies or sports' as a role model, the pros outweigh the cons

Votes
Average: 8.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...andpoint, the advantages of following a sports personality are that young minds can le...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, whereas, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03056768559 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85523408878 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61135371179 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5234037353 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6153846154 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145624691456 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465323850842 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613093466379 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845748708617 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286243967523 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.