Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Give your opinion on this matter.
It is often seen in our society that the successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. but the younger generation must understand that all that glitters is not gold.
The footballers like Messi, the cricketers like Virat Kohli and the film stars like Jennifer Lawrence and Deepika Padukone are often the inspiration of the youngsters. While they are all the big achievers in their respective fields, they should not be the idols of the masses because their contribution has not made the world a better place to live. Instead the great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and Mother Teressa; and the great scientists like Einstien and Madam Curie should be the source of real inspiration for the youth.
The great leaders and the great scientists mentioned above have brought harmony and peace in the world and have changed the lives of humans for the better. The youngsters who aspire to be like them would think of making actual contribution for humanity. such contribution is more important for the nations than just earning big money and fame through sports and entertainment. Countries across the world need great leaders and great thinkers to be their future, and such requirements can be fulfilled by the youngsters thinking and aspiring in the right direction. Moreover, there are many sports stars and movie star but there is a big vacuum of good leaders and thinkers across the world.
To conclude, the sports stars and the movie stars should be seen for entertainment purpose and the real inspiration should be drawn from the great leaders and the great thinkers who have improved the humanity and the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-09 | Pavitra Kumari | 65 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | Tamanna_87 | 55 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | Tamanna_87 | 55 | view |
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this? 77
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Give reasons for your answer and include any 84
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house/ flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter•explain the reasons for the noise•apologise•describe what action you will takeYou should write at least 73
- Parents play imp role in educating children as teachers. Agree/disagree? 65
- There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measurements will be needed. Discuss both sides. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...m stars are role models for youngsters. but the younger generation must understand ...
^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... made the world a better place to live. Instead the great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...aking actual contribution for humanity. such contribution is more important for the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 8.36945812808 263% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03971119134 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5540846517 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490974729242 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6184300334 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.909090909 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 7.25397266985 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225208816178 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107205904002 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159947512738 0.071462118173 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19165222334 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14671917595 0.0609392437508 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.1260098522 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.