The effect of large shopping mall replacing the small local ones, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of international shopping mall investors has sparked the controversial over the potential impact of this trend on small local shops in recent years. It can be agreed that building big new brand shopping centers has some positive impacts, but some people claim that it has some negative impacts as well. This essay will elaborate how large shopping mall will help city's economy and how this might lead to less profit to local shop owners and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why large shopping mall will develop town's economy, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that replacing old local shops for bigger and modern infrastructures will increase the number of potential tourists who visit the city. For instance, in New York the construction of the biggest shopping mall of the US contributed with the development of the city in 2010. New brand shopping mall, therefore, can play a vital role to increase the number of visitors in the city.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that replacing small local shops for big shopping centers is significant, but the most predominant lies in the fact that local business owners will lose on sales. As an illustration, Zara and Forever are well globally known companies, so small local competitors do not have the budget to compete in prices. Competency, hence, can play a vital role for small business shop owners in order to generate more profits.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of replacing small local shops for bigger shopping centers is prominent, although there are some drawbacks that should be well handled.
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing? 88
- Should voting be compulsory for all citizens or people should have freedom to choose not to vote What is your opinion 77
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 80
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take? 80
- In developing countries, tourism has advantages and disadvantages. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05863192182 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66102447524 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524429967427 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3880070904 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.9669160288 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402542658216 0.242375264174 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162289447188 0.0925447433944 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682365905927 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25359990045 0.151781067708 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346913469838 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.