Traditional teaching technique vs contemporary practical teaching. Which is more effective?
In this modern ear, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the modern practical base teaching methods and its benefits. Some societies use traditional teaching methods to educate their pupils, but most of the modern countries use methodical and practical styles when educate the students. In this essay, I would like to discuss and analyse both educational methods and express my opinion.
First and foremost, contemporary practical teaching is a scientific up to date method that use by most of the countries in the world. It has been proved by different researches as a suitable method. For example, after complete researches in universities, research papers and white papers are used by Chines government to update the vocational education in China. There fore it is strongly believed, the modern practical base education as a well-established teaching method.
On the other hand, some of the people believe, traditional teaching style as the best way to educate students. Countries like India use this method, and they use their inherited teaching styles from ancestors. But, most of this teaching methods are not well documented, and not methodical. For example, some of the Ayurveda medicines react as an allergy for patients, which doctors learn using traditional education. There for it is taken in to consideration, that the traditional teaching styles as a life thread for human being.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed modern practical teaching as well known and theoretically prove method that every teacher should follow. Finally, governments should focus of the education and teaching system as a critical factor which update time to time.
- Should English be the universal language? Discuss 77
- Traditional teaching technique vs contemporary practical teaching. Which is more effective? 77
- Do the dangers derived from the use of chemiclas in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your won experience or knowledge. 77
- Most high-level jobs are done by men. Should governments encourage that a certain percentage of these jobs be reserved for women? What is your opinion? 77
- A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Therefore
...date the vocational education in China. There fore it is strongly believed, the modern pra...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... teaching method. On the other hand, some of the people believe, traditional teaching st...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ented, and not methodical. For example, some of the Ayurveda medicines react as an allergy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...lergy for patients, which doctors learn using traditional education. There for it is ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4030418251 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92739615577 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524714828897 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0112950979 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.5 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176132202568 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072249647462 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447484472807 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118602957712 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158366550402 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.