Universities deduct marks from those who students are late. Give your opinion and examples.
At university, students receive penalties for late submission of their assignments. This essay will discuss why due date and such punishments are mandatory and help to evaluate students’ performance.
Coursework assessment for higher education is time limited and failing to meet the deadline results in mark deduction of final marks. At work, it is mandatory to complete tasks within a limit time frame so that a sequence of tasks leads to a positive outcome. Penalties due to late submission educate students to manage their time effectively and ensure the quality of their submitted assignments. This helps to prepare students for future workforce where time is one of the most important factors in workplace. As a result, it is necessary to give mark deduction to those who fail to meet the given deadline.
Due date and penalty can be used to evaluate students’ performance. There are numerous reasons why students fail to meet their deadline. Most likely, this occurs when the students do not spend enough time on the task. Another common reason is that they start working on it very close to the due date. Consequently, they cannot find the answer or any approach to solve the problem. Late submission indicates lack of time management and inability to carry out intensive research within a limit time. It will be unfair for students who submit their assignment on time to be equally assessed as those who fail to meet deadline. Therefore, marks should be deducted for late submission.
To conclude, this essay has argued that punishment should be applied when students submit their assignment late as this prepares them for future workforce and encourages them to meet the deadline. In my opinion universities should deduct marks from students who do not meet deadlines for their assignments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-12 | pbdarab | 88 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | ameliale92 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | ameliale92 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | ameliale92 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | ameliale92 | 77 | view |
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 77
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 77
- Tourism industry is benefit for any country or not 77
- Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples. 55
- Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, therefore, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15593220339 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84343137462 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51186440678 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0328556164 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4705882353 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250725681554 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911025416243 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962311156455 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165682935888 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500594837022 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.