University will deduct the student's score for a late assignment. What are the reviews and possible solution of it? Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of reviews of deducting student's score for a late submission by the university and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that an ageing population for individuals and society can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, late assignments can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, late assignments might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting score for a late submission far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications
- cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree? 88
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. how widespread is the problem? what problem will this shortage of time causes? 85
- experimental learning, traditional learning in high school and university. agree or disagree? 88
- University will deduct the student's score for a late assignment. What are the reviews and possible solution of that? Discuss. 85
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78623188406 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34205498877 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4804243162 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185681138211 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609712004704 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866447123534 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107917986393 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075258948683 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.