The violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of people who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that watching violent movies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the violence portrayed on television can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, horror and violent programs might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the rate of crime could relate to this reality that the demerits of juvenile crime pertain to preventing crime. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the possibility of becoming criminal by watching violent films far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Daniela Apolo Machado | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | smb.arami | 85 | view |
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 88
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.675 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14819149574 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664285714286 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1744887343 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189777703326 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059297259187 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774290343171 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998042611907 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680496293711 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.