Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of shifting focus from theoretical knowledge to practical training and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of having considerable skills is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that management skills can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, paying more attention to practical training can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of developing practical skills, as well as practical experiences, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered practical implications. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a wealth of experience and finding more job opportunities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the role of practical subjects in schools might increase the consequences of a brighter future. Moreover, fundamental aspects of competitive markets could relate to this reality that the demerits of improving motivation pertain to showing true potential of students. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of being prepared for working is correlated negatively with technical knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of practical plans in schools.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having practical courses in universities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing productivity prove the significance of potential advantages of practical training, but also knowledgable graduates' implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | maryam2 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?OrShould government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of p 79
- It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas are giving 88
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 85
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 85
- Some people think law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83157894737 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34735738716 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7459014558 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192628618152 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586964111691 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042350170934 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102643862095 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244683076803 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.