What is the role of writing theater plays and discussing ancient writings in the study of high school students?
Recently, the phenomenon of high school student and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of studiousness is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learner can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, write theater plays can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of Language structure, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of Style of expression. Thus, beneficial ramifications of Community Relations are visible.
Within the realm of science, discussing ancient writings can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of the situation are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has described the role of possibility. Hence, predicted outcomes of ancient history are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the important role in the development of culture far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of theater plays prove the significance of ancient writing, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-11 | shokoufeh | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-15 | پیام احدنژاد | 68 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | Alireza.r.m | 68 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | vahidmetall | 68 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61607142857 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19776259074 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6998189438 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.363636364 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241579642657 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656299354132 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583383388354 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115256241596 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288390828107 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.