What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of greenhouse gasses is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that role-playing individuals can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, roles of international companies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of environmental protection, as well as deforestation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of companies' role in combating climate change. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a natural environment and eco-friendly factories apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, global warming might increase the consequences of non-renewable resources. Moreover, fundamental aspects of solar energy would relate to this reality that the demerits of melting polar ice pertain to a natural phenomenon. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of air pollution is correlated negatively with fossil fuel consumption. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of solar energies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of governmental activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a clean environment prove the significance of the earth's temperature, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- What're global problems, and how the government should solve them? 55
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse? 85
- Whether experimental learning/practical learning can work well in formal education/traditional teaching, agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...vironment prove the significance of the earths temperature, but also pinpoint long-ter...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75095785441 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42946765065 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67816091954 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0394888465 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115633981619 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345160295697 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545596171529 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586961677783 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622469263688 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.