Criminals in prisons are dealing with new cases, and some are teaching them. Which method is more effective to reduce the crime rate? Rehabilitation or punishment? Give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of teaching prisoners and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of arresting criminals is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning new cases in prisons can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, rehabilitation methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the strict law, as well as educating prisoners, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered effective methods to reduce the crime rate in societies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both well-trained policeman and professional judges apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, criminals' punishment might increase the consequences of illegal drugs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of becoming a criminal would relate to this reality that the demerits of illegal activities pertain to a death sentence. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of serial killers is correlated negatively with social services. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of increasing the crime rate.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of crime rate reduction far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being punished prove the significance of criminals' rehabilitation, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-16 | AkashPTEnikalo | 88 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | MRK | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | milad21rz | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | milad21rz | 80 | view |
- More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement? 88
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems.What are the underlying causes? 11
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Medical technology helps to live a long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67680608365 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2717388399 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669201520913 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5551750363 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262731255202 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734211262601 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490526525566 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125661771624 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456903408168 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.