What is your idea of Involvement_of_employees_in_decision_making process in the company?
Recently, the phenomenon of involving employees in the decision-making process and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of participation of junior workers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that boosting the revenue of the company can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, involving employees in the decision-making process can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that protecting the brand, as well as improving the quality of products, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between client and employee. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both job satisfaction and creating motivation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of loyalty among employees, participating employees in making an informed decision might increase the consequences of sharing ideas. Moreover, fundamental aspects of adding value to the company would relate to this reality that the demerits of exploiting the workers pertain to leaking the secret information of the company. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of financial problems correlated negatively with corrupted behavior. Hence, it is correct to believe that presume the preconceived notion of controlling risk.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of involving employees in decision-making process far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of creativity prove the significance of popularity of the company, but also pinpoint the responsibility of both manager and employers as social implications.
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 85
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 80
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r and employers as social implications.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77027027027 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37282651926 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.08664498 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254360688362 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819047920809 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106873230772 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146472242187 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344573842684 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.