Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practice this in a particular field can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the positive design of the buildings on people’s life and work can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes like happiness, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university researcher, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the negative design of the buildings on people’s life and work might increase the consequences of depression and unpleasant reflex on customers. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the positive design of the buildings on daily living people and their work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | kcowz1110 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 65 | view |
- Now doctors can talk to patients by using internet-based communication in the office. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 85
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- Children should learn good handwriting or typing at school which is more important 85
- Some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 80
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... impact on people's life and work? and its corresponding impacts have sparked ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60207612457 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25789893718 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608996539792 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6316068012 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.916666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435142354291 0.242375264174 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153224581667 0.0925447433944 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.238192278033 0.071462118173 333% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240131650246 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125383203699 0.0609392437508 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.