Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?

These days, there is a controversial debate among people about the impacts of experimental learning. There are a significant number of people who interpret the experimental learning as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent's view. I am inclined to believe that experimental learning is beneficial and should be promoted promptly by everyone.
First of all, recently it is argued by scientists that learning by touch plays a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This may be attributed precisely to the fact that experiencing at class creates a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which consequently open avenues to new achievement, therefore, their enthusiasm and self-confidence will be amplified subsequently towards many daunting tasks. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2015 has found that teaching with objects could enhance a person's intellectual ability to make decisions related to social and personal life.
In addition, it is claimed that learning by experimental teachers could ease the way of learning. In other words, it is believed that if students want to have a prosperous future, they should know kinesthetic sense is paramount to success in any major because it would instil a strong feeling of self-esteem, which makes them triumphant in their future. For example, with the advent of new useful laboratory equipment, students could learn chemistry as well as physics with the help of their teachers in various labs.
To conclude, the foregoing discussion propounds that experimental learning is practical and could ease the way of learning. It is recommended that people should take cognizance of detrimental effects of excessive attention to experimental majors like physics.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 manraj123 70 view
2020-01-29 Alireza.r.68 85 view
2020-01-29 manraj123 55 view
2020-01-28 manraj123 80 view
2020-01-27 Alireza.r.68 88 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 524, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...hat teaching with objects could enhance a persons intellectual ability to make decisions ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56179775281 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21066637503 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632958801498 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2496184961 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.25397266985 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132877918844 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583728588197 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427610143317 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851229141799 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421245700127 0.0609392437508 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.