You are given climate as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area for your study?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of preventing global warming is highly beneficial, such issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying major effects of global warming can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, preventing the climate change can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that balancing pollution as well saving non-renewable resources, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered usage of renewable has a significant effect on preventing global warming. Thus, the beneficial consequences of electronic cars and use of renewable resource apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of climate change, excessive use of fossil fuels might exacerbate the consequences of melting glaciers. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of greenhouses emission related to this reality the demerits of energy usage pertain to carbon footprints. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of global warming is correlated negatively with greenhouse gasses. Hence, it is corrected to presume the preconceive the notion of energy-intensive manufacturing.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using a renewable resource to prevent global warming far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of these kinds of resources prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also reduce carbon dioxide's implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | edsonsimoes | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | jasman singh | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | arami | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 84 | view |
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Which do you prefer use specific reason to develop your essay. 73
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 89
- more information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree with the statement 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...sses. Hence, it is corrected to presume the preconceive the notion of energy-intensive manufact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75812274368 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28178106054 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642599277978 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.521705951 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0458123395851 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158130021105 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209248758761 0.071462118173 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0257111366609 0.151781067708 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197792016066 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.