similar jobs with you for your children?
Family education varies greatly. In some families, they are inclined to ask their child follow their advice why talking about choosing a job, because they have faith in their own choice. But others, may just give their child freedom to choose whatever they like. The two different kinds of education may have extremely distinguished effects on their offspring. I personally agree with the later education method.
For one thing, interest is the best teacher. To give their child freedom when choosing a job is quiet positive compared force them follow the parence's orientation, which is so-called passive method. Under the positive method, the child would like to gain enough motivation based on their personal learning needs from their inner heart. Hence they can get into the working environment quickly, and search for help whenever they come across the difficulties, never give up. There is no doubt that they can make the improvement step by step. However, with the passive method, they have to be pushed to move forward, since they lack the inner willpower to support them on this way. Once the push disappear, they would go backwards. For instance, if the parents force their child, who prefer to literature teaching, to doctor. Definitely, the child can hardly find it attracting, even he or she becoming a doctor as last, I bet that he or she cannot gain happiness from the job and may even loose the confidence to life no matter how much money he or she has gained from it.
For another, the mutiple jobs would devote to the diversity of the family topic. We can easily imagine what will happen in a single job family, all of the family members work on the same field. Their topics are confined in this area, saying , if they are all teaching physics, most of their topics must connect to the physics. When they comfront a problem, they are just able to percive it in the same way, as the effect of the single knowledge. On the contrary, if all of the members work in the different field, for example, the mother work as a musician, the father is a doctor, then their child become a banker. They would share tremendous message of their field with each other, all of them can benefit to the broad topic, and even they are possible to create new invention by combining the different fields. When someone got a headache, the doctor can deal with the problem; when they are stressed, the musician mother can play the music to help them; and the child are good at using their saving to invest.
Admittedly, the children can accept many suggestions from their parents if follow their job, but they can also find help from their teachers or coworkers which in turns foser their independence. All in all, I would strongly rommond the parents just free their force on the child when decide their working field. Just let them go, it is possible that they would have a great performance beyond your expectation.
- Children should only play sports for fun not in competition or contests 60
- Should the parents give their child money to encourage them? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:Movies and televisions should always show audience good people are being rewarded and bad people are being punished? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement :Considering the complexity of the environment, we can not do anything to improve it. 85
- The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual. 66
Sentence: To give their child freedom when choosing a job is quiet positive compared force them follow the parence's orientation, which is so-called passive method.
Description: A verb, past participle is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to compared and force
Sentence: On the contrary, if all of the members work in the different field, for example, the mother work as a musician, the father is a doctor, then their child become a banker.
Description: The fragment child become a is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace become with verb, past tense
Sentence: When someone got a headache, the doctor can deal with the problem; when they are stressed, the musician mother can play the music to help them; and the child are good at using their saving to invest.
Description: The fragment and the child is not usually followed by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Sentence: Admittedly, the children can accept many suggestions from their parents if follow their job, but they can also find help from their teachers or coworkers which in turns foser their independence.
Description: A conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to if and follow
Sentence: All in all, I would strongly rommond the parents just free their force on the child when decide their working field.
Description: The word free is not usually used as a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to free
Description: The fragment when decide their is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace decide with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Sentence: When they comfront a problem, they are just able to percive it in the same way, as the effect of the single knowledge.
Error: percive Suggestion: perceive
Error: comfront Suggestion: confront
Sentence: All in all, I would strongly rommond the parents just free their force on the child when decide their working field.
Error: rommond Suggestion: ?
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 506 350
No. of Characters: 2338 1500
No. of Different Words: 252 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.743 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.621 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.27 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 148 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.083 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.36 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.542 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.267 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.432 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5