In recent years, a great deal of attention has been paid to how to deal with the food-supply crisis caused by the increasing world population. Some may believe that one of the possible solutions to this problem would be GM foods, while others may be of the opinion that the technology would be extremely harmful. In my opinion, genetic engineering would be a promising strategy, if such a measure would be implemented wisely.
The first point to be considered is the fact that GM food technology makes it possible that crops grow bigger and faster. For instance, according to the recent research conducted by one of the prestigious universities in Japan, GM wheat, rice or other staple crops require only a half of growth period and create a double amount of harvest on average compared to not GM ones. Such characteristics of GM crops will contribute to supplement the global food shortage. What’s more, some GM crops are more resistant to disease or insects. Evidence for this development is found in positive results have been reported one after another that GM crops have successfully increased the amount of yield while inhibiting damages caused by disease or insects. It is important especially for developing countries where food shortage is severe because these countries have suffered from disease or insects damage for many years.
On the other hand, some people may worry about that there may be risks involved in the genetic engineering foods. Their primary concern would be that GM crops might change whole ecosystems; food chains can be broken if crops are resistant to predators. However, given the fact that a series of laws are now introduced to minimise the negative impact on the natural environment from genetic engineering technology before its implementation, such fears seem somewhat excessive.
To sum up, we can expect that GM foods would be an effective measure to save to many people from famine if we correctly use the technology to harmonise the natural environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...e increasing world population. Some may believe that one of the possible solutions to t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'crop'.
Suggestion: crop
...not GM ones. Such characteristics of GM crops will contribute to supplement the globa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09696969697 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81931551 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4936659516 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.384615385 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1456073514 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576777323989 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026378448955 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845460357501 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268603261658 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.