These days, an ample emphasis has been placed on how to raise offspring. While many parents concur that children should be inculcated to participate in group activities, many others claim that it is imperative for juveniles to learn how to keep themselves busy in solitude. This essay aims to discuss both views, followed by my own perspective.
Some guardians believe children should participate in group activities because they acquire inter-personal skills and learn how to be sympathetic. Children learn how to cope with their peers as well as how to behave when in groups, which is definitely helpful in their future professional life. For instance, a young adult that has socially been active during childhood years will be more competent in interacting with colleagues. Moreover, by taking part in group activities such as team sports, children learn that everyone has weaknesses and they should help less unfortunate in order to achieve success. I agree with these points and believe they are irrefutable; therefore, team activities have indeed constructive effects on children.
On the other hand, some others assert individual activities are best for children, for they achieve independence and competitive morality. Individual occupations in leisure time teach children to rely on themselves because no one else is present to either entertain or help them; hence, the only tool to attain success is one’s own skills and proficiency. Furthermore, they learn to be always at the zenith of their performance because there is no one to cover their weaknesses and flaws. However, while these points may seem indisputable, I believe there is the possibility of detrimental consequences such as behavioral and mental disorders like depression, which eclipse the benefits. Thence, I do not think this method worth the cost.
To summarize, although both individual and group occupations in free time seem to have benefits for the children, I tend to disagree with the statement that it is best to encourage children to take part in solitary activities because they may have irreversible consequences such as psychological disorders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40178571429 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02146369215 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5562956351 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368220724815 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114479602002 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694286446025 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216498354732 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332885482078 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.