It is often thought that providing tertiary education to youngsters could be fruitful for the nation, whereas some opine that augmenting number of youngsters receiving higher education could result in rise of unemployment rate. In my opinion, although highly qualified youth is considered to be an asset to the society but myriad soul-crushing drawbacks in terms of unemployment and other social-economic issues can be witnessed.
Attaining university education aids the people in getting an influencing job out-and-out entailing handsome salary, thereby turning them into men of parts. A graduate degree in engineering which a student receive could be a most desirable and bewitching quality for the industry or academic institutes. For instance, a graduate has vast knowledge and exposure as compared to under graduate students hence, could aid in bringing laurels for the industry as well as country.
On the contrary, a rush of university degree holders in particular field of study could pose detrimental effects on employment scenario in a country. The countless and uncontrolled university pass-outs could not have job and it could be a herculean task for limited number of organizations available to bestow employment for each one of them; thereby augmenting the gap between jobs and job seekers. Besides, job they could get might not be sufficient for them to earn bread and butter for their family. So, count of jobless graduates is enhancing at a fast pace.
In conclusion, it can be advocated that imparting quality and higher education to the mundane strata could help a nation to reach the pinnacle of success, yet a balance between industrial demand of manpower and university output as educated youth should be maintained for the holistic developments of country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...led university pass-outs could not have job and it could be a herculean task for li...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3665480427 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03334390792 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590747330961 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.830298561 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.8 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162804051156 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644334441602 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239107581293 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093247941291 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369795463279 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.