Edification methods have always been the subject of heated debates. While some people assert boys and girls should be taught in separate schools, others opine it is more beneficial for children if they attend mixed schools. This essay aims to investigate the reason behind both views, followed by my perception.
Supporters of single-gender education claim there is one particular reason why their view on edification is justified, namely the less distractive nature of single-sex education due to the absence of another gender. Youngsters have a tendency to be attracted to the opposite sex, which causes them to wander and steer away from their duties. This issue, however, will be eliminated if pupils attend separate schools. This way, they will stay more focused on their courses and get less distracted, allowing them to learn well, which in turn allows them to perform better in their final examination. For instance, statistics of research conducted by the Harvard University in 2015 acknowledge that students who go to separate educational institutions score 21 percent higher marks than those who enroll in mixed ones. This evidence highlights the benefit of enrolling in separate schools due to the scarcity of distractions for tutees.
Another angle on this debate, however, suggests that co-education is a superior method because it helps children improve their social skills. The fact that inter-personal abilities play a pivotal role in people’s success is irrefutable. Students’ who attend mixed schools interact with their counterparts, allowing them to be more competent around other genders, which in turn leads to the development of their social skills. I, for example, went to a high school that was attended by both boys and girls and I learned how to behave and treat the opposite sex with the respect they deserve; consequently, when I started to work at my current job, was more comfortable and confident around my female colleagues.
To recapitulate, this essay has examined both sides of the arguments and has shown both separate and co-education have advantages for students such as less distractive atmosphere and better social development, respectively. However, I strenuously believe children should attend mixed schools because isolating them from opposite gender will lead to social destitution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45054945055 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95317275487 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574175824176 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8292327385 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.266666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245655719607 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773690043123 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782015165528 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159144375994 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512705082558 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.