Some cities create housing for the growing population by providing taller buildings. Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land? What solution is better ?
In this contemporary life, there are more and more growing people living in cities, some cities support the growing population and have decided to build many skyscrapers. However, other cities prefer to create housing by building on large areas of land. This essay will examine both solutions and give the opinion which is more the best solution.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of cities choosing to provide taller buildings for the growing population. First, government subsidies for building are believed to equalize living conditions among young adults regardless of their background family. This taller building support presumably tends not only to increase the overall population rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority. For example, taller buildings can have attractions to many visitors and become the symbol of that country, can grow the economy and change living standards. Second, taller buildings would result in a higher number of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that taller buildings are more suitable for university students and living in a short time or support the tourist.
Nevertheless, building in a wider area of land could help the government to save the financial, meaning that there would be more input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. In addition, this solution would tempt many people including those who are not on the terms of money or show no interest in living in a big city, thereby adding a great population in modern life and spreading positive energy and potentially encouraging them to do hard-work even though they have a good life. It, instead, would be a more viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted people.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of taller buildings, I believe it’s more suitable for upper class people than for everyone. From my perspective, governments need to consider before do that solution to grow population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 06/10/2025 - 14:46 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that spending money on developing technology on space exploration is unjustifiable and there are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 78
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The maps below show the layout of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ite the advantages of taller buildings, I believe it’s more suitable for upper cl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 965.302439024 183% => OK
No of words: 331.0 196.424390244 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32930513595 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80169417287 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 106.607317073 186% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598187311178 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 283.868780488 196% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8562903741 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370337101043 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131082200077 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127156286356 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205661435824 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11189302844 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 40.7170731707 246% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.