The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002. It
includes those with a degree, those with a higher degree (postgraduate) and those with other
qualifications. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph described how much the graduates earned in 2002 from different age groups, and from those having different qualifications. Overall, we can clearly see that those people that were younger would earn more than the elder ones.
Firstly, with people having higher degree there was an upward trend, in which the number climbed dramatically, with those were from 21-35 years old. About the elder ones, from 35-45, the increase was slight, from between 600 and 700 to between 700 and 800. On the other hand, there was a marginal fall with people from 41-45 to 51-55, it dropped from between 700 and 800 to a little bit more than 700, whereas, with the oldest people, the amount of money grew up gradually to approximately 800. Secondly, there was a steady increase recorded with people from 21-40, and having low degree, then with the elder one, the money that they can earn stayed unchanged, between 700 and 800. Finally, with other ones, it was recorded that the younger people from 21-40 years old earned more, there was a dramatical upward trend, whilst with the people were 45 or older, the money they can made dropped steadily
To sum up, we see that all people with different ages and different qualifications would earn money high or low
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002 It includes those with a degree those with a higher degree postgraduate and those with other qualifications Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main featur 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australians cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...t dropped from between 700 and 800 to a little bit more than 700, whereas, with the oldest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 880, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...le were 45 or older, the money they can made dropped steadily To sum up, we see...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, then, whereas, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83486238532 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26109102318 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9319869251 43.030603864 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.571428571 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251886632042 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134866253961 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759799919278 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189818091864 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013911193653 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.