The three pictures show the position of a volcano and a village before and after the volcanic eruption Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The three pictures show the position of a volcano, and a village before and after the volcanic eruption. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.

These three photographs give information about how the volcanoes are changed before and after the damage of volcanic eruption and the position at first.
Overall, the change of volcano before the volcanic eruption is all table and there are many people living there. Meanwhile, everything changed when the eruption happened. However, it’s more clear if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the first picture that gives the position at. It can be seen clearly the position of volcano stand in the mountain and higher, especially they are surrounded by water and trees. The position is good for science and research. In contrast, the volcano before the volcano erupted from the normal volcano to the village. First, the volcano stands on the left side on the west and water gives to the people living there. Moreover, the place and people planting more trees surround the homes, helping people have more comfortable living conditions. Second, they built five homes opposite the volcano but they still have the road for walking but it’s still a suburban area.
Look at the final picture that shows the volcano after the volcanic eruption. It can be seen that everything changed compared to the village before the volcanic eruption. First, the volcano damage caused by the eruption it’s also the reason why the volcano has become a volcanic eruption and is flowing through the streets and people’s homes. Moreover, people planted more trees for living. Finally, the homes are narrowed and damaged by the eruption from five homes to two homes. So, through three pictures we can know more about nature and how natural phenomena affect life and the changes of the village.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2025-05-31 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
Essays by user Trần Ánh Vy :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05755395683 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3071438821 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482014388489 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0517266781 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7058823529 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249761234886 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895132595106 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082124101402 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185017764532 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662923702092 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.