Nowadays, television advertisement is one of the best ways for attracting consumers on a large scale and must of the companies spend a lot of money for TV commercial programs in order to propagate their products. As a result, it is an ongoing debate about whether most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are or not. Although multitudes of people think that advertisement in most of the times show reality and facts about products, in my view, they mostly deceive people by saying incorrect or unknown information about products. The following paragraphs are set to elucidate my reasons.
First and possibly the most important reason why I agree that advertisements are deceptive is that advertisements usually repeat one message about one product again and again and it causes that consumers tend to believe that message while it is not true. As a case in a point, TV commercial about a car shows a driver always stops to pick up his friends and narrator always says that it is a rummy car, it has a plenty of place, it is a car for our family and it causes that people accept that it is a big car while it is small car.
The second aspect that is deserved to be outlined is that advertisements usually use celebrities to advertise products and since people believe that celebrities are trustworthy, they trust them for buying products. As a practical epitome, when a popular celebrity advertise a race car and he says ''I love my fast car'', people think that car is really fast while it is not so fast.
Last but not least, advertisements usually utilize fantasy in child commercial and it is hard for children to distinguish reality and fantasy. Thus children want to buy them as a result of fantasy characteristics of advertisements while in fact; these characteristics are not really correct.
In a nut shell, taking all the aforementioned reasons into consideration, we may draw conclusion that advertisements usually use some ways for advertising products which are not really show facts about them.
- The only thing that interferes with my learning is toy education- Einstein? What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct? 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- You need to study climate change. Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why? Use examples. 36
- . Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- In Academic studies, grouping of students according to their academic abilities is good or not? Discuss and give your opinion. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ren to distinguish reality and fantasy. Thus children want to buy them as a result o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, really, second, so, thus, while, in fact, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 20.9802955665 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 346.0 242.827586207 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89306358382 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03356021102 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511560693642 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.5024630542 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.609472873 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.909090909 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4545454545 20.9669160288 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177670769665 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721442750117 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482362311407 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103862486528 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347572984082 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.3980295567 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.