the charts show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The given pie charts well compare information about proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to communicate other language in addition to English in 2000 and 2010. Overall, it is evident that there are 3 general trends: an upward, a downward, and stable.
In detail, it can be explained that the number of students speaking English only and that of those speaking French only experienced the downward trend because the figures of students speaking English declined greatly from 20% in 2000 to 10% in 2010. Similarly, there was a slight rise in the number of students who were able to speak French by 5% in 2010 (from 10% in 2000). On the other hand, the upward trend belonged to the trend of students communicating with Spanish, another language, and 2 other languages, starting at 30%, 15%, and 10% respectively in the first year, reaching to 35%, 20%, and 15% respectively after 10 years later.
Finally, it is interesting that the number of British students speaking German underwent the stable trend since there was a levelling off at 10% in both 2 years mentioned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the the statement? 84
- Home-schooling 89
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a large city versus lining in a small town Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- the charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, similarly, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68419982504 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56914893617 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9269859087 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.333333333 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44690558791 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22189980968 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.217188631273 0.0843802449381 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305118585192 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177430246521 0.0819641961636 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.