average carbon dioxide emissions per person in uk Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
explain graph
This graph illustrates average co2 emission per person in uk ,Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007
This graph shows Co2 emission per person in uk Italy Portugal aand Sweden from 1967 to 2007.Uk and Sweden had the highest per person ratio in 1967. While Italy and Portugal had slowly climbed up the statistical board and had a greater averiage per person in 2007 than the previous years
In 1967 Uk and sweden were the highest per person average of co2 9 and 11 respectively.After swedens highest numbers were recorded in the year 1977 both countries had a steady decline over the aforementioned period and had a per person average of below 10.
Italy and Portugal with the lowest per person average in 1967 figures reamainh below 6.But they had a steady rise in there number which rose to a staggering 5 and 6 average per person in 1997 and maintaining its stastistics in upcoming decade.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problemsto what extent do you agree or disagreeWhat other measures do you think might be effective 56
- Prevention is better than cure Out of country’s budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventive measuresTo what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 61
- some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more importantdiscuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98.The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report 67
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roadto what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es average co2 emission per person in uk ,Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 t...
^^
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Italy
...ge co2 emission per person in uk ,Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007 Th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Uk
... Portugal aand Sweden from 1967 to 2007.Uk and Sweden had the highest per person r...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...person in 2007 than the previous years In 1967 Uk and sweden were the highest p...
^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...on average of co2 9 and 11 respectively.After swedens highest numbers were recorded i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'swedens the highest'.
Suggestion: swedens the highest
...rage of co2 9 and 11 respectively.After swedens highest numbers were recorded in the year 1977 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...verage in 1967 figures reamainh below 6.But they had a steady rise in there number ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82692307692 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71185668255 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50641025641 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 22.4926829268 231% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0729778318 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 251.0 112.824112599 222% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.0 22.9334400587 227% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513222545203 0.215688989381 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.377994891138 0.103423049105 365% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161280295774 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383663012697 0.15604864568 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14837015265 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.3 13.2329268293 206% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 35.62 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 10.3012195122 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.9970731707 207% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 11.0658536585 253% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.