The line graph compares the amount of books which are read by male and female at Burnaby Public Library between 2011 and 2014.
It is obvious from the data that the reading number of men and women were equal in 2013.
In 2011, the number of books read by men started at 3000 and there was a slight increase to 4000 in 2012. After 2012, the amount of reading books rose dramatically and hit a peak at 14000 in 2014. For women, the reading rates saw a steady increase from 5000 to reach a highest point at 10000 in 2013 before dropping back in 2014.
In the first 2 years, the reading rates by female was more than male reading rates and women read books higher than men by 2 times in 2012. The amount of books read by men were more than women between 2013 and 2014. In 2014, the male reading rates higher than female by 6000.
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 67
- The charts below show how selected age groups purchased concert, cinema, and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed. 67
- Some people say watching TV is bad for children in all ways others say it is good for children to get knowledge Discuss both views and give your opinion 52
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.Write at least 150 words. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...aw a steady increase from 5000 to reach a highest point at 10000 in 2013 before d...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 675.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.24528301887 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.82989688396 2.65546596893 69% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477987421384 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 183.6 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8595886044 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.375 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318172765493 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168871233946 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617116288906 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223405054788 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497593190084 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.37 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.37 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.