Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school?
The importance of evaluation method of accessing student's performance was always a debatable topic. Even though many people believe that this can be done by continual assessment of their assignment work and project works. On the other people are in favor formal written examinations. I believe latter appears to be more appropriate option. This can be analyzed by looking at both the cases with reasons and examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, the workbook assignments submitted by students are not done by them. A study by the education department of India proved that many parents help their children in completion of their assignments. Not only this, projects are copied from other students in order to submit them on time. Thus, it is clear that it is not a reliable method to judge students' capabilities.
Secondly, the examination that is taken in educational institutions makes students learn the concept and memorize the same what they studied in classroom. Moreover, these exams are conducted in presence of invigilator and that restricts students to take any external help. This formal written assignments shows how much grasping power does an individual have. Therefore, formal written examinations are considered as one of the most reliable method to test one's ability.
To conclude, looking at the discussion it is clear that advantages of written formal assessment outweighs the advantages of testing by assignments and project work. I believe that written examinations method should be implemented across the globe and it can be predicted that many countries adopt this method of assessment because of its effectiveness.
- Pros and Cons of extreme or adventure sports? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 80
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 77
- International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded. what are causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 77
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37404580153 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97769616251 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572519083969 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2689950233 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8666666667 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147147139266 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489652208006 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571122263593 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959976187158 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660527919444 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.