International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded. what are causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem
The importance of international travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded was always a debatable topic. Although some people believe it is wrong, I tend to believe that it is human biased and there are some causes and perfect solutions. The substantial influence of tourism has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. The following essay would further elaborate the impact of international travel and tourism and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, the impact of tourism on making people biased has become a long running dispute among the public all over the world. From religious point of view, western tourists are bound up tightly with culture changes, which they might lead to damage to the local culture and religions. For example, a profound group of psychologists working at prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relationship between temples and religious backgrounds as well as prayers. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that perfect solutions are correlated positively with not only making them familiar but also tensions.
Furthermore, the tourism industry undoubtedly attributable to social changes, in that it would lead to both social backgrounds and moral reforms. A well known example of such attributions are narrow- minded people, which are cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take host countries for granted. Thus, prejudiced visitors could play an important role respecting local culture.
To conclude, I agree that tourism could make people biased. However, as every garden have some seeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislations.
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? Do you think school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago? 85
- due to professional work, we ignoring family and personal work. do u agree? how diff to achieve 80
- children should take larger number of exams or learn more in schools? 55
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
- Schools should organize activities after class. To what extent do you agree? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52592592593 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86312346826 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 1.56157635468 512% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7138529137 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195156823952 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709153360376 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864254418873 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1114454282 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881297310533 0.0609392437508 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.