Original of a silver coin found in America.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.
The passage and the talk both discuss about a silver coin found in America that whether it is genuine or not. The writer contends that it is a fake coin made by someone to mislead the public. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessments. She demonstrates three reasons to cast doubt on the calims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is that the coin has been found far from the place that the Norse people settled- the eastern canada. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that Norse were the people who traveled far distances, therefore it is probable that the coin was brought to that area by them. For instance, many other objects has been find in such far distances from the original place of them.
Second, according to the text, no other coin has been found in the eastern Canada, so it stands to reason that Norse never brought that kind of coins to the North America; although, the speaker finds this idea debatable. She bolsters her opinion by stating that when the Norse people went back to their countries they packed up everything which they had brought with themselves to that region, especially the coins that were precious. That is why there is not any coins like that in there.
Lastly, the lecture contradicts this fallacy of the passage that Norse did not bring any coin with themselves from the urope, because they knew that silver coins were not useful for them in the North America, saying that they knew silver coins were appealing for the native americans, since it was beautiful. What is more, native american could use them to make jewleries like necklesses. So, the Norse could use silver coins to purchase any goods they need from the native people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | NIMA SAEEDI | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | zhrnrz1992 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | dorsagh | 86 | view |
- creation of new regulations for handling and storing of the power plants waste. 85
- Summarize the point in the lecture and the passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Ways to eliminating the destructive effect of the glass architectures for the flying birds. 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... made by someone to mislead the public. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, kind of, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76973684211 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26528931151 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523026315789 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.234954047 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.538461538 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179794165833 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652608801473 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459655660324 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113995693704 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343300832597 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.