Damage of the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. Discuss.
It’s common knowledge that the technical advance and increase of the living conditions have adverse effect on the environment all over the world. Some people think that it’s inescapable and mandatory condition for the global development while other think that environment protection is a crucial point and could not be ignored during the process of improvements. There are some arguments for and against the above-mentioned points, which will be discussed below.
On the one hand, environment protection should be the greatest concern of every country because our planet provides people with natural fossil fuels such as gas and coal, which are used by plants and manufacturers. They, in turn, recycle these natural resources thereby ensure population with all means of existence and move technological progress forward. It leads to the fact that if all resources are depleted by human beings, population won’t have any opportunities to make worldwide improvements and push the economies towards the success. Moreover, congestions from up-to-date transport and devices pollute the environment by releasing exhausted fumes into the atmosphere and cause the significant danger for subsequent development of the planet.
On the other hand, rainforests are the main sources of wood which is used for producing paper, household equipment and building constructions. So people can’t afford themselves not to use this kind of indispensable resource, but they can contribute to forests planting. Moreover, by using natural recourses, people facilitate their daily routine, produce cutting edge equipment and raise the level of living standards, so consequently, the usage of resources is inevitable part of worldwide improvements. But despite this fact, people should respect and treat the environment in order to gain more benefits from it.
In conclusion, I can state that with the progress in technologies and living conditions, people couldn’t escape from damaging the environment. But, nonetheless, they are responsible for the world where they live in so they should be aware of environment protection and don’t neglect the environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | fatemeh fazli | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | fatemeh fazli | 84 | view |
| 2018-04-24 | Marichka1000 | 84 | view |
- To what extent is the use of animals in scientific research acceptable? 56
- Should developing countries concentrate on improving industrial skills or should they promote education first? 78
- Damage of the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. Discuss. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'forest'.
Suggestion: forest
...le resource, but they can contribute to forests planting. Moreover, by using natural re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72923076923 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12901443924 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0747432989 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.230769231 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10406078934 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353311608343 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0232656104291 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598852678387 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00851361280388 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.