Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree / Disagree ?
The fact that affect of certain type of music on young children's learning was always a debatable topic. Many people believe that listening to different kinds of songs is beneficial to children in some way or other way in future. I completely disagree with the statement that it will distract students education. This essay would further elaborate the reasons how learning music or listening to music doesn't distract academics with justifying examples.
First and foremost, there are numerous reasons why I am not in favor with this statement. Firstly, music has n number of benefits. It helps to heal certain kinds of disease. Listening to music will improve children concentration and memory power. Classic music helps young students to open up new ideas and think creatively while performing something. These also help us to boost our confidence and build pride. For instance, specifically, a study conducted by University of Music Department at United Kingdom proved that learning certain kinds of music will help to overcome risk.
Furthermore, learning this music not only helps in building personal development but also let students to choose their career paths in that respective fields. It also build self confidence and develop an positive attitude while learning and playing different musical instruments. Moreover, kids learn team work as most of the programs require coordination among students. For example, children who has stage fear will be able to overcome that problem. Learning certain kinds of music helps us to think in creative way and help them to resolve any problem.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that certain types of music will promote learning and help to build secure future in the music field. In a nutshell, I believe that the benefits of music outweigh its drawbacks.
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 80
- Education is important as it teach ethics and life value as it teaches us practical things for future employment What is your opinion 81
- technology and new inventions is it beneficial or detrimental to the society 96
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid What do you think 66
- ageing people good/bad? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...al to children in some way or other way in future. I completely disagree with the stateme...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ow learning music or listening to music doesnt distract academics with justifying exam...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'builds'?
Suggestion: builds
...aths in that respective fields. It also build self confidence and develop an positive...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... also build self confidence and develop an positive attitude while learning and pl...
^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...sical instruments. Moreover, kids learn team work as most of the programs require co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27364864865 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74713269405 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0286773325 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7222222222 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31534917094 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101211529359 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954328292591 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209449480183 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534896186958 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.