Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree/disagree
Recently, the effect of music on young children's learning has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what is the impact of music on children's learning?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is not highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, traditional methods are bound up inextricably with examination booklet, which indicates they lead to both oral exam and course syllabus. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between children's learning and mental ability as well as an exponential increase in imagination. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of art is correlated positively with not only life experience but also practical skills.
Within the realm of music world, without the slightest doubt, creativity attribute to extracurricular programs, in that it would come down to painting, music school bands, and performance. A salient example of such attribution is piano player, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take hard working for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint one-dimension education problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to social activity, team working, and even future career. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of art and music in children motivation.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of music are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | DEEP KANG | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Jasmaansingh1996 | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
- ’In future illiterate will not be those who cannot read, but those who do not learn’ – By some writer. Discuss what do you understand by this statement and state your reason. 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? (Discuss with appropriate examples.) 80
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Mass media 11
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the educational standpoint, traditi...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erience but also practical skills. Within the realm of music world, without...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and music in children motivation. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69204152249 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21056552492 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681660899654 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.799598392 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.538461538 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135446036194 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405149851665 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686028809611 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812242782484 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067672340565 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.