In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed . Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of the war of idea and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the political ideology is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the study of enforcing political agenda can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the declaration of group’s ideology can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the movement of political agenda, as well as the opposing idea, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of the religious fanatic on the massacre. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the dogma and the terrorism apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of political science, getting kill in political clash might increase the consequences of prevention of liberty. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of lack of freedom of speech could relate to this reality that the demerits of the ideological opinion pertain to restricted rules. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of acting in favor of group’s interest is correlated with lack of freedom of expression. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the civil war.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of suffering people because of their political idea far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the advantages of the public opposing prove the significance of unsustainability of political circumstances, but also pinpoint legal implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Anand_DD | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Sidra018 | 80 | view |
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries.” According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals?individual? 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agr 88
- The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issu 33
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agr 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., but also pinpoint legal implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44709897611 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23698501133 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610921501706 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1926842832 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129224784711 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387742169369 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347681401921 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680747355878 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369043055887 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.